JUST AN OBSERVATION

Just an Observation

So it transpires the British Biased Corporation are a little bit sexist in the way they decide what rate of pay to pay their ‘stars’. It would seem that if you are of the male persuasion then it is highly likely that you will be paid considerably-quite considerably- more than if you are female. It makes me wonder whether the recent appointment of Jodie Whittaker as the long overdue first female Dr. Who is simply a money-saving exercise disguised as a step into the more gender fluid and equality based 21st Century, but we will come back to that later.
It wasn’t just the gender based pay gap which was shocking however but the actual levels of pay themselves were quite astounding: Chris Evans on over 2 million basic, Gary Lineker on 1.5 million, Graham Norton on 850, 000 and trailing behind the highest paid female Claudia Winkleman on 500, 000.
It would seem that the more irritating you are the higher you get paid- Gary Lineker is probably the least irritating out of this bunch although his Twitter response was regarded as smug but was really just a misjudged attempt at irony- and why anyone would want to pay Vanessa Feltz £350,000 for anything other than to just go away permanently is beyond me.
There has been talk since the pay gap was revealed that perhaps by lowering the male salaries to bring them onto line with those of the females is a solution but somehow I can’t really see that happening. Can you?
Meanwhile whilst this debacle was raging its way through the headlines and stealing the limelight the government very sneakily brought in an earlier start to new legislation raising the retirement age to 68. Funny there was no mention of this in their manifesto before the election. It is almost like they thought it might lose them votes and therefore best not to position it alongside such sure-fire election winners such as Fox Hunting and the Dementia Tax. I mean Really!
Back to the other BBC scandal this week which was the appointment of the first female Dr. Who, Jodie Whittaker. Personally I can’t see what the fuss is about as the idea of a time travelling alien with two hearts who can regenerate almost at will whilst flying around in a blue 1960’s style police box is hardly grounded in reality itself. It could certainly introduce a new slant on the ‘it’s bigger on the inside’ line frequently used in the programme.
I feel similar to how I felt when John Barrowman played Captain Jack Harkness –in both Dr. Who and its anagram spin-off Torchwood- that it was a huge and positive step forward for gay role models on television. I mean a gay man who is not only immortal with special powers but also on the right side of good-looking was a new thing on television.
The fact that Barrowman went onto blow it by going all musical theatre on us is irrelevant; it was the fact that gay men could be shown in a positive light that was new. What was important was the belief that he was virtually indestructible which meant that he didn’t have to die or suffer too much for his perceived sins which was both innovative and refreshing. Somewhere out there teenage boys struggling with their sexuality had a positive role model that could make them feel better about themselves as opposed to troubled gay men on TV who came beset with a whole set of issues merely to make them appear interesting and give them a raison d’etre. The other TV stereotype was the mincing queen which was generally stripped of any sexuality at all. Barrowman ushered in a new breed of desirable gay men.
I am hoping Whittaker has the same impact on young girls and helps to break down the socially constructed binary gender rules which have been stifling western growth for generations. Hopefully this is a step forward in smashing those restrictive walls. On a personal level she is lovely as I met her during last year’s film festival when she was promoting her film Adult Life Skills and we even danced at a cailidh –Kim Cattrall also joined us- so I can now say I have actually danced with Dr. Who. And she was a FEMALE! Bonus!
Now let’s hope she is paid accordingly and at the same rate as previous Doctors.
Still struggling with the upcoming Fringe and have ‘narrowed down’ my possible shows to a slightly impossible sixty-six so a bit more streamlining is needed. It doesn’t help that it still all seems so far away-even though it is only two weeks- as the weather still feels like it is late winter/early spring. I wish it would hurry up and catch up before the summer is over and it hasn’t even started!

Advertisements
    • Alan Renstead
    • July 21st, 2017

    Isn’t it typical BBC shadiness that they would offer to lower men’s earnings to meet those of the equally deserving women’s, rather than do the right thing and flip it? If the foosty stuffed shirts at the Beeb can justify these stellar salaries for the men, and it is an issue of equality, then they need to offer the same to the women. Otherwise, they are suggesting that they are in fact overpaying the guys.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: